Kia Picanto 1.0
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2013
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Kia Picanto 1.0
Car A
Kia Picanto 1.0
The Kia Picanto 1.0 focuses on efficient city use and good value, with 5.6 l/100 km consumption and a low entry price. Performance is modest, but five seats and a 255 L boot cover everyday needs.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety5.6 L/100km
Honda Fit 2013
Car B
Honda Fit 2013
A city-focused 5-seat FWD model that pairs a roomy 470 L trunk with efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. With reliability and safety as priorities and a 16,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety132 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 52 / 67
City 76 / 75
Budget / value 72 / 74
Road trip 20 / 31
Performance 36 / 30
Cargo 14 / 26
Practical 49 / 55
Premium 9 / 14
Winter 16 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Kia Picanto 1.0 · Orange = Honda Fit 2013

Specs side-by-side

Spec Kia Picanto 1.0 Honda Fit 2013
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Kia Picanto 1.0

  • Good value in its segment at a 15000 entry price
  • Efficient for its class at 5.6 l/100 km combined
  • Urban-friendly performance; relaxed acceleration suits stop-start traffic
  • Five seats and a 255 L boot handle daily errands

Honda Fit 2013

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km for daily commuting
  • 470 L trunk and five seats handle everyday family tasks
  • Reliability and safety rank as key strengths
  • At 16,000, it represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Kia Picanto 1.0 if…
Best fuel economy
Kia Picanto 1.0 uses 5.6 L/100km vs 5.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2013 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2013 puts out 132 hp vs 67 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons