Honda Fit 2009
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Soul
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2009
Car A
Honda Fit 2009
The 2009 Honda Fit blends five-seat practicality with efficient 1.5L performance and a notably large 712 L cargo area for family and city use. Signals point to strong reliability and safety at a price that represents good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Kia Soul
Car B
Kia Soul
The Kia Soul pairs five-seat practicality with efficient gasoline running and a very large 752 L cargo area at a price that suits growing families. Best for city and suburban use with FWD and modest performance, it’s less ideal for harsh winters or enthusiasts.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety150 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 76 / 75
City 74 / 59
Budget / value 74 / 66
Road trip 37 / 50
Performance 30 / 31
Cargo 40 / 42
Practical 61 / 57
Premium 13 / 21
Winter 20 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2009 · Orange = Kia Soul

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2009 Kia Soul
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2009

  • Versatile 712 L cargo space supports growing families and errands
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km for city and commuting
  • Signals emphasize strong reliability and safety priorities
  • At 15,990, represents good value in its segment

Kia Soul

  • Generous 752 L cargo space suits growing-family gear and weekly shopping
  • Efficient for its class at 7.6 L/100 km to help manage fuel costs
  • Good value in its segment at a 19,900 price point
  • Easygoing everyday performance (150 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.5 s) for commuting and city driving

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2009 if…
Best fuel economy
Honda Fit 2009 uses 6.5 L/100km vs 7.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Kia Soul if…
More power
Kia Soul puts out 150 hp vs 118 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons