Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Forte Sedan
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
Car A
Ford Taurus (1996-1999)
With a V6, FWD, and a 540 L trunk, the 1996–1999 Taurus offers good value for budget-focused buyers and works well for road trips.
5 seatsSedanGasoline4-star safety
Kia Forte Sedan
Car B
Kia Forte Sedan
An affordable compact sedan that prioritizes reliability, safety, and efficient daily use for budget-focused commuters and small families. Performance is adequate and the 425 L trunk is practical, but it won’t suit premium tastes or cargo-heavy needs.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety7.6 L/100km147 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 56 / 61
City 36 / 53
Budget / value 61 / 69
Road trip 59 / 49
Performance 32 / 32
Cargo 30 / 23
Practical 39 / 43
Premium 24 / 21
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Taurus (1996-1999) · Orange = Kia Forte Sedan

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Taurus (1996-1999) Kia Forte Sedan
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Taurus (1996-1999)

  • 540 L trunk suits road trips and family cargo
  • V6 with 244 Nm and 9.0 s 0–100 km/h is adequate for everyday passing
  • 10.2 L/100 km combined is efficient for its class
  • Price of 18995 represents good value in its segment

Kia Forte Sedan

  • Good value in its segment at a $19,500 price
  • Reliability-first focus with a safety emphasis for daily commuting
  • Efficient for its class with a combined consumption of 7.6
  • Practical 5-seat layout and 425 L trunk suit small-family duties

Verdict

Pick Ford Taurus (1996-1999) if…
Lower entry price
Ford Taurus (1996-1999) starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Kia Forte Sedan if…
More power
Kia Forte Sedan puts out 147 hp vs 145 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons