Ford Puma ST-Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Soul
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST-Line
Car A
Ford Puma ST-Line
The Ford Puma ST-Line blends family-friendly space with efficient running and punchy acceleration. It suits growing families and city driving while offering good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km200 hp
Kia Soul
Car B
Kia Soul
The Kia Soul pairs five-seat practicality with efficient gasoline running and a very large 752 L cargo area at a price that suits growing families. Best for city and suburban use with FWD and modest performance, it’s less ideal for harsh winters or enthusiasts.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 75
City 60 / 59
Budget / value 65 / 66
Road trip 41 / 50
Performance 29 / 31
Cargo 25 / 42
Practical 52 / 57
Premium 25 / 21
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST-Line · Orange = Kia Soul

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST-Line Kia Soul
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST-Line

  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 combined consumption.
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s for confident merging and overtakes.
  • 456 L boot and five seats work well for growing-family errands and trips.
  • Around 30,000, it represents good value in its segment.

Kia Soul

  • Generous 752 L cargo space suits growing-family gear and weekly shopping
  • Efficient for its class at 7.6 L/100 km to help manage fuel costs
  • Good value in its segment at a 19,900 price point
  • Easygoing everyday performance (150 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.5 s) for commuting and city driving

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST-Line if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma ST-Line uses 6.5 L/100km vs 7.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Kia Soul if…
Performance & capability
Kia Soul is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons