Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Soul
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST
Car A
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km200 hp
Kia Soul
Car B
Kia Soul
The Kia Soul pairs five-seat practicality with efficient gasoline running and a very large 752 L cargo area at a price that suits growing families. Best for city and suburban use with FWD and modest performance, it’s less ideal for harsh winters or enthusiasts.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 75
City 59 / 59
Budget / value 64 / 66
Road trip 41 / 50
Performance 28 / 31
Cargo 25 / 42
Practical 51 / 57
Premium 25 / 21
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Kia Soul

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Kia Soul
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Kia Soul

  • Generous 752 L cargo space suits growing-family gear and weekly shopping
  • Efficient for its class at 7.6 L/100 km to help manage fuel costs
  • Good value in its segment at a 19,900 price point
  • Easygoing everyday performance (150 hp, 0–100 km/h in 9.5 s) for commuting and city driving

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma ST uses 6.9 L/100km vs 7.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Kia Soul if…
Performance & capability
Kia Soul is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons