Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Picanto 1.2
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST
Car A
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Kia Picanto 1.2
Car B
Kia Picanto 1.2
A city-focused model that prioritizes efficiency and value, the Kia Picanto 1.2 suits commuting and light family duties. It trades outright performance and cargo space for low running costs and simplicity.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety4.5 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 53
City 59 / 78
Budget / value 64 / 76
Road trip 41 / 20
Performance 28 / 29
Cargo 25 / 14
Practical 51 / 51
Premium 25 / 10
Winter 26 / 16

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Kia Picanto 1.2

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Kia Picanto 1.2
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Kia Picanto 1.2

  • Low purchase price (~15000) offers good value in its segment
  • Efficient for its class at 4.5 L/100 km, keeping fuel bills down
  • Five seats and a 255 L trunk cover everyday errands and school runs
  • Strong reliability signals fit daily commuting needs

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma ST is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Kia Picanto 1.2 if…
Performance & capability
Kia Picanto 1.2 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons