Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Forte5
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST
Car A
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Kia Forte5
Car B
Kia Forte5
The Kia Forte5 blends family-ready space with brisk, efficient performance at a price that reads as good value in its segment. It suits growing families and city commuters who want capability without excess cost.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km204 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 77
City 59 / 61
Budget / value 64 / 70
Road trip 41 / 50
Performance 28 / 32
Cargo 25 / 42
Practical 51 / 61
Premium 25 / 23
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Kia Forte5

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Kia Forte5
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Kia Forte5

  • Expansive 754 L cargo space for family gear and weekly shops
  • 204 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s for confident merges and passes
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km to help manage fuel spend
  • Priced at 23,990, offering good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma ST is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Kia Forte5 if…
More power
Kia Forte5 puts out 204 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons