Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Kia Ceed GT
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST
Car A
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Kia Ceed GT
Car B
Kia Ceed GT
The Kia Ceed GT blends strong acceleration with efficient running (6.5 L/100km) and good value in its segment. Five seats and a 395 L trunk keep it practical for city use and small families.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km204 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 65
City 59 / 60
Budget / value 64 / 68
Road trip 41 / 41
Performance 28 / 31
Cargo 25 / 22
Practical 51 / 53
Premium 25 / 25
Winter 26 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Kia Ceed GT

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Kia Ceed GT
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Kia Ceed GT

  • Strong acceleration for confident overtakes and merges
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100km
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 395 L trunk for daily family needs
  • Strong reliability and safety signals

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma ST is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Kia Ceed GT if…
More power
Kia Ceed GT puts out 204 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons