Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma
Crossover · Gasoline
Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100
Car A
Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100
The Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100 suits budget-focused city and small-family needs with five seats, a 352 L boot, and efficient 5.8 L/100 km running. Performance is modest (100 hp, 0–100 km/h in 11.2 s), but it aligns with buyers prioritizing reliability and safety.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Ford Puma
Car B
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma offers good value in its segment, pairing efficient petrol running with practical five-seat space for city and family duties. It leans on reliability and safety rather than premium trimmings or performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 67 / 71
City 69 / 57
Budget / value 71 / 72
Road trip 37 / 49
Performance 29 / 22
Cargo 26 / 32
Practical 52 / 55
Premium 14 / 22
Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100 · Orange = Ford Puma

Specs side-by-side

Spec Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100 Ford Puma
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100

  • Good value in its segment for cost-conscious buyers
  • Efficient for city commuting at 5.8 L/100 km combined
  • Practical for small families with five seats and a 352 L trunk
  • Appeals to shoppers prioritizing reliability and safety

Ford Puma

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety for daily use
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers
  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 456 L trunk suit growing-family needs

Verdict

Pick Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100 if…
Lower entry price
Kia Stonic 1.4 MPi ISG 100 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Ford Puma if…
More power
Ford Puma puts out 155 hp vs 100 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons