Audi RS 3 vs Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Audi RS 3

Sedan · Gasoline · AWD

Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Sedan · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Audi RS 3

The Audi RS 3 pairs very high performance (0–100 km/h in 3.8 s, 290 km/h) with all-wheel-drive traction in a five-seat compact. It’s good value in its segment for speed-focused buyers who still need year-round usability, but efficiency and cargo space are clear trade-offs.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety10.5 L/100km400 hpAWD

Car B

Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

A five-seat, twin-turbo V6 performer that blends family usability with serious speed and a strong safety standing. Efficiency and cargo space suit small-family needs but are less ideal for city slog or haul-heavy duties.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety

Why compared higher top speedcomparison pickalternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrain

Usage fit

Family 55 / 60

City 41 / 30

Budget / value 47 / 51

Road trip 52 / 59

Performance 44 / 38

Cargo 15 / 22

Practical 34 / 38

Premium 56 / 39

Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi RS 3 · Orange = Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi RS 3 Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3

Serious pace: 400 hp, 480 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s.
AWD traction supports confident winter and wet-weather driving.
Seats five, making it viable as a family compact.
Good value in its segment for the performance on offer.
Small trunk (282 L) limits cargo for trips or strollers.
Combined consumption of 10.5 L/100 km is thirsty for daily commuting.
Higher price than non-performance compacts.
No hybrid or EV option for improved efficiency.

Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Serious performance for the money: 0–100 km/h in 4.9 s and 270 km/h top speed.
Twin-turbo V6 and 510 Nm make highway passing and road trips easy.
Seats 5 with a usable 406-liter trunk for day-to-day family needs.
Good value in its segment at around $50,000 given its pace and safety standing.
Combined consumption of 10.7 L/100 km hurts efficiency in daily commuting.
406-liter trunk and family-compact focus limit cargo-heavy use.
Front-wheel drive may not suit buyers who prefer rear- or all-wheel-drive dynamics.
Costs more than many mainstream compact family cars.

Verdict

Pick Audi RS 3 if…

Best fuel economy

Audi RS 3 uses 10.5 L/100km vs 10.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Kia Stinger 3.3 GT if…

Performance & capability

Kia Stinger 3.3 GT is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3

Kia Stinger 3.3 GT

Verdict

Related comparisons